From the horse's mouth of the Jews, blacks and leftists

In writing my book, I have long been aware that we all tend to flee from highly unpleasant facts. It is a tendency, but not an iron-clad rule. Adults who emotionally ARE adults face unpleasant chores, tasks, situations and truths every day. Millions right now are cutting back drastically on their expenses; and why? Because they are not believing the government that “the economy is slowly turning around.” They are facing the fact, born of years of painful experience, that THIS GOVERNMENT LIES EVERY DAY ABOUT EVERYTHING.

In point of fact, if the moral climate is ever clear and genuine leaders ever guide us, then we are ready to follow such genuinely good leaders, and this means, an this facilitates embracing both higher truths and painful truths which our leaders come before us to explain.

As mature adults we know from experience that accepting a disagreeable and scary truth may cause short-term pain, but in the long run the embrace of truth leads to the result that Jesus Christ both manfully and divinely proclaimed:

“THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.” (Gospel of Saint John 8:32)

And ONLY the truth will do this. A lie is a comforting placebo that sooner or later is replaced by an even worse reality than yesterday’s when we began our procrastinating about it.

This is why Winston Churchill, whom I despise for his germanophobic policies of 1936-45, must be admired at least for this: for his grasp of white psychology and especially of British psychology.

He said in a famous 1940 speech after Britain’s army was clobbered by the Germans on the fields of France, warning what kind of war lay ahead against the formidable war power of the German Reich:

“I have nothing to offer you but blood, toil, tears and sweat.”

And this seemed like the kind of frank talk that the British wanted. There is a real magic in the speaker who can skilfully choose an effective way to sound and be blunt, and sound and be honest about the realities we face.

For deep down we all recognize that truth has a sacred quality. Our lives depend on truth, not illusions or wishful thinking. And if listeners and readers are prepared psychologically in advance for such awful moments when they must hear the verdict or the diagnosis of our situation, then they are helped and they do not flee, but instead take a deep breath and grow.

A real leader thus does not terrify his people with the truth; he calms his people by the truth, by the sense that now they know what they need to know.

He says by way of warning: “Here comes a bitter truth, but the embracing of it can save us in the long term, because we will also act vigorously, with a solid plan, and with gifted, selfless leadership guiding us, to deal with the hardships ahead. I will guide you as we courageously face the storm. From now on we act as an indissoluble team; we make things happen FOR us and we no longer will let things happen TO us. We are not adrift; we are tacking into the wind.”

Every sailor knows about “tacking.” It means a sailboat by skilfull zig-zagging can sail toward the wind, into the wind, yes actually use a headwind to go forward. The very same wind that is blowing stiffly against your face can move you forward, the opposite of its direction! Adversity becomes an energy. It may involve going forward in a sideways manner, back and forth, endlessly, but it really works. You sail into the wind, against the wind and use the wind. In the end you have crossed the dark and mighty bay and stepped in safety onto the distant shore.

But first we have to accept reality, the headwind, the breeze being directly “against” us.

And the first thing needed to wake Whites up is for them to grasp this headwind now.

They are now at this point. They sense a sinister tone, a murky series of goings-on at the governmental level that seems hostile. Obama is a dark cloud ahead, almost literally. Whites now hear the thunder. They feel their boat rock. They see it taking on water. They see whitecaps on the waves.

So they accept now there is a very stiff headwind.

Tacking into the wind.

Then they have to accept our own diagnosis of the problem: a storm is coming right at us. They must accept our truth as being the truth. And the way that we explain things must cut off every alleyway of easy skepticism, every excuse to escape, every excuse to rationalize the tendency to cowardice, selfishness and irresponsibility that lurks when the call of duty looms.

For example, if I were to write any of the three items below, one could say, to escape reality: “Well, John de Nugent, you are hardly an impartial observer of what minorities do. You are a racist, antisemite and a Nazi!”[sic]

Yes, to just spout my own views would give excuse-seekers the “out” they want.

So instead I search for statements where blacks, Jews, homosexuals, and self-hating white leftists themselves are admitting PUBLICLY everything I say.

I let THEM confess I am right.

Now after proving that these various minorities admit all my points, then there comes to moment of the heart’s truth, because the mind accepts but the dark parts of the heart rebel in selfishness and fear.

And I cannot help those who are born psychopaths, or deeply cowardly and irresponsible lugs.

But with the other half of our race, when it has been made crystal-clear to them that the minorities admit, confess and even proclaim every point I was making, then the magic instant has come when the heart is briefly open to the heroic life. The moment of awakening is at hand, the desire to be a man or woman, not an animal slave, and fight back for freedom and dignity. To rise above the mud and the petty, disappointing ego state. To feel pride, to be a son or daughter of God again, with a moral and social mission here on this earth God made, our testing ground.

And so I am publishing today three items, which are all going into my book, where our enemies concede all the points we have been making for decades.


This is about a prominent black civic leader in Atlanta, Georgia, black-ruled since the 1970s by the Maynard Jackson political machine. The city’s slogan became”the city too busy to hate.” A friend of mine called this city, now full of blacks, Mexicans, various Asians and white northern liberals and white southern leftists, “the Yankee island that 300,000 Southerners died trying to prevent.” Under black rule it is wracked by crime, inefficiency, terrible schools — the usual in any black-run city, whether Detroit or Newark, Atlanta or Capetown, South Africa.

And so here we have Aaron Turpeau, and this is his website:

As the National Policy Institute writes:

Aaron Turpeau, an Atlanta political activist and strategist, has dropped a little bomb into the middle of the citys mayoral race in the form of a memo to unknown black leaders in Atlanta. The document, intended to be private, calls on black Atlanta to unite behind a single black candidate to keep the mayors office in black hands, allowing the city to pursue what Turpeau calls a black agenda.

(Full text available here)

The memo, which came to light Thursday, makes at least two egregious, offensive and dangerous assumptions:

First, it treats the mayors office as a black possession, a trophy of sorts that could be surrendered to white Atlantans for the first time in 35 years. That is a cartoonish, archaic approach to politics that, among other things, ignores the humanity of individual mayoral candidates, with all their strengths and weaknesses, and tries to reduce them to mere representatives of their respective races.

[…] the memo is valuable because it brings to the surface a sentiment that is more widely held among black voters than many local leaders, black and white, would care to publicly acknowledge. Many black voters older voters in particular take pride in the idea that Atlanta is a black-run city, and for some that sense of pride would be diminished if a white person were elected to lead it. (end)

What we see here is that all blacks are racists, because all races are racist. When Colin Powell, a black military officer who had been constantly promoted up the lader by Republican presidents, had a choice between John McCain, a white man of his own party, for president, or Barack Obama, a black man of the opposite party, he voted the racist way, he voted for his race, he voted for the Democratic black although he was a Republican for decades.

What we also see here is this: no matter how light-skinned a negro is,Turpeau, Powell, Obama or Atty. General Holder, his white blood will not endear him to the whites to whom he is partly related. And his white genes may help make him fairly intelligent, but his black skin will make him hate the whites — who do not accept him as part-white but see him instead as part-black.

But whites cannot not see the blackness, because whites ares racist as blacks, or Orientals. In fact, all history proves that all races have always been racist — like all dogs are dogists, all fish are fishists and all cats are catists. We do not pal around with other or rival life forms. We prefer our own kind; when one of us is attacked by a stranger we all react.

And if that is wrong, then God, who made us exactly this way, is wrong, too. Then liberals have to castigate God for making us different and preferring our own people. Yes, God is a sinner for not making us all coffee-colored and stirring us into one big uniform black-eyed, black-haired, brown-skinned soup speaking ugly languages like Arabic, Chinese or Mexican Spanish.

Yes, the liberal is realy saying here, diversity is the sin, the sin of God — and the liberal is on a self-appopinted mission to correct God, to change the Nature that He made, and make God repent of His racist mistakes… the liberal putting together the races that God had put asunder.

And bringing asunder the white unity that God had put together.

All OTHER races should be proud of their people — and seek power and never eversurrender it — but whites should be ashamed to be white, surrender power with gushing little liberal hearts over their city, their schools, thier jobs and even their lives, and never take power back — even if chaos results from a black/Mexican takeover.

Uh-huh…. We don’t buy it, but thanks for blatantly saying it, Dr. Turpeau. You’re a racist, and we have to be racists again too. Like God, who made the races separate and distinct. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the Guy who made one billion galaxies.


I love it when liberals are occasionally sincere and are forced to condemn their favorite minority, the Jews, for violating the liberal code of kindness.

Here are the first paragraphs:

* * *

The New “Blood Libel”?

Israeli Organ Harvesting


Last week Swedens largest daily newspaper published an article containing shocking material: testimony and circumstantial evidence indicating that Israelis may have been harvesting internal organs from Palestinian prisoners without consent for many years.

Worse yet, some of the information reported in the article suggests that in some instances Palestinians may have been captured with this macabre purpose in mind.

In the article, Our sons plundered for their organs, veteran journalist Donald Bostrom writes that Palestinians harbor strong suspicions against Israel for seizing young men and having them serve as the countrys organ reserve a very serious accusation, with enough question marks to motivate the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to start an investigation about possible war crimes.1/

An army of Israeli officials and apologists immediately went into high gear, calling both Bostrom and the newspapers editors anti-Semitic. The Israeli foreign minister was reportedly aghast and termed it a demonizing piece of blood libel. An Israeli official called it hate porn.

Commentary magazine wrote that the story was merely the tip of the iceberg in terms of European funded and promoted anti-Israel hate. Numerous people likened the article to the medieval blood libel, (widely refuted stories that Jews killed people to use their blood in religious rituals). Even some pro-Palestinian writers joined in the criticism, expressing skepticism.

The fact is, however, that substantiated evidence of public and private organ trafficking and theft, and allegations of worse, have been widely reported for many years. Given such context, the Swedish charges become far more plausible than might otherwise be the case and suggest that an investigation could well turn up significant information.

Below are a few examples of previous reports on this topic.[….]”


Sunday, Aug 30 2009

PETER HITCHENS: If we hadn’t fought

World War 2, would we still have a British



Peter Hitchens
[*Hitchen’s mother was a Hungarian Jewess; he admitted once he “qualified for Israeli citizenship.” His fanatically atheistic older brother is the columnist and author Christopher Hitchens.]

Stop the film. We’ve seen it so many times before: the toothy, simpering features of Neville Chamberlain and his bit of paper, an unbalanced Hitler waving his arms about and shouting, the German troops pouring across the Polish border, columns of smoke over Warsaw, more columns of smoke over Dunkirk, German troops marching through Paris, the Battle of Britain, flames across London, a dogged Churchill poking through the ruins, El Alamein, the turning point, our ‘Finest Hour’, Spitfires soaring over Kent. And so on, until triumphant victory six years and tens of thousands of lives later.

The story is all wrong. If it were as good and as right as that, and if we won it, how come we look back on the Second World War from conditions we might normally associate with defeat and occupation?

Crowds in Downing Street the day after the Second World War was declaredHome front: Crowds respectfully line the kerb in Downing Street on September 4, the day after war was declared. Suits and raincoats were required

We are a second-rate power, rapidly slipping into third-rate status. We have a weak currency and shrunken armed forces, deployed as auxiliaries in wars that are not in our interest, and we are largely governed from abroad.

Our Parliament is a bought and paid-for puppet chamber. Our culture and customs have been debauched and our younger generations corrupted, as subject populations are, with drink, drugs and promiscuity.

We are compelled, like an occupied people, to use foreign measures to buy butter or meat, and our history is largely forgotten or deliberately distorted in the schools to suit anti-British dogma. Those schools are unable to educate most of our children up to the levels of our main rivals, so ensuring that we provide no challenge to them. Our country has been Balkanised into provinces and regions.

[….] The rest is here,, along with this Daily Mail reader comment:

* * *

Well done, Peter, just because millions die and the outcome is ‘needed’ doesn’t make any war right to fight.

After much reading over the past few years I am now convinced Churchill is a war criminal, who took the Empire to war specifically to DESTROY it. Churchill answered to higher powers than the British people, and it was the sole objective of the WW2 to destroy the British, Japanense and German spheres of influence.

I cannot thank enough and admire greatly the sacrifice of the many thousands of allied troops who went to war at Churchill’s behest, but Hitler never wanted war with Britain. Instead he wanted a mainland European empire to partner the seaborne empire of Britain. Benefitting from British trade routes to Africa, India and south east Asia.

As before we should look to the puppetmasters (who of course are stil in place) who use ‘Judas goats’ to goad us into war with propoganda and pointless jingoism – for the true driver of war – profit.

Ask Rudolf Hess!


– Steve Henson, Southampton, UK, 30/8/2009 10:11


And this is a key part of my book, our enemies making our points for us in ways that make us absolutely credible.

Once whites get real that we are surrounded by enemies who hate us, then they will ask: who can lead us out of this, and what is his plan?



1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Letter to black-power psychologist «

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Yes No